September 7, 2009

Daemon, by Daniel Suarez

Great book!

It’s not often that I’ll start out a blog review like that…but this book really surprised me. The story was extremely well thought out, the characters likeable (or not, as appropriate), and the action kept the story moving along.

Now, I have to preface this by saying that this is a Geek novel. There are very specific references to computer hardware and protocols that would probably turn off non-Geeks. Fortunately, I am a Geek (Badge #L33T ;-), and I appreciated this book all the more for the accuracy of the technical details. Suarez is himself a computer security-type Geek, and that comes through in the detail of the book. It was like he was talking both of my primary languages (English and Geek).

Would this book appeal to non-computer types? Maybe. My wife is interested in reading it based on the parts of the book I’ve described. She’ll probably just gloss over the technical stuff that she wouldnt’ find interesting, which is probably fine. It’s not critical to following the story. In fact, you could probably remove it and the story would be fine. I could easily see a movie being made from this novel and the writers/director leaving out the technical details to increase mass market appeal.

So what is so appealing? It’s a typical What If? scenario. What if a computer genius invented a program (the “Daemon”) that could evolve and adapt to new scenarios to meet whatever goal was programmed into it? What if that program was spread across the Internet and couldn’t be eradicated by virus cleaners? And what if the creator of the program was a mad genius bent on changing social norms based on advanced technology?

That’s what this book is. It’s an excursion into a computer doomsday scenario–the typical AI takes over the world–but with so much thought put into it that you find yourself wondering if the Daemon is such a bad thing. Of course, killing people, which the Daemon has no problem doing, is bad…but is targeting evil corporations that make millions by swindling others, is that a bad thing?

That’s the cool part here. Imagine an evil corporation that is run by several generations of a single family and has a small board governing it. Who’s to stop that company from preying on the poor, the weak, the gullible? If it’s a private company, there’s no way to buy youself in. The best way in the door is through the computer. Take over the company’s computers, hold all of its information–and therefore, money–hostage…and you can do what you want with them.

And now, what if the creator was dead so that there’s no legal repurcussions possible and noone to tell you how to turn it off.

On top of that, throw in some other really cool, geeky stuff:

  • A virtual reality that controls the meatspace
  • Self-driving and autonomous cars
  • Secrets to accessing the daemon’s virtual world hidden in maps in First Person Shooter games.

All that raving being said, there are a couple of bad points…but are they really bad? One, there’s a twist at the end that was a bit annoying. Two, that twist–and a couple of other important points–sets up the forthcoming sequel. I’m thrilled that there’s a sequel planned, but it feels like this book is too dependant upon it. I wanted a more definitive conclusion to this book.

Some have compared this book to some of Michael Crichton’s work…I guess that’s fair. But the two things I like better about this book than I do most of Crichton’s work are that 1) the technology is more accurate/believable (which I’m sure some will dispute) and 2) I don’t get the technophobe/”the world is going to end if I use a toaster” feeling that I always get from Crichton (particulary Prey). Of course, I’ll keep reading Crichton since they fall into my favorite genre…but given two books on my nightstand, I’d pick up the Suarez one first!

Daniel Suarez is definitely on my NewBookAlerts list!

April 3, 2009

The Google Monopoly?

Filed under: Book News, Technology — david @ 11:00 am

The New York Review of Books had an interesting response recently about concerns that Google is in the process of creating a monopoly of “access to information.” This discussion was specifically brought about by the Google Book Search project which will allow users to read up to 20% of a book online.

Personally, I see this as quite a benefit. I always use the book snippets available on Amazon.com in making a purchasing decision, but that is a random, small tidbit, and not always indicative of the information I need to make an informed purchase decision.

I think that monopolistic concerns are almost always valid, but equally almost always unfounded. I think we, as a society, need to be concerned about allowing so much informational access to be managed (not controlled) by a single source. On the other hand, as referenced in the article, the situation, while not perfect, is definitely an improvement of the existing (and past) systems. I also think Google has taken these concerns into account by accommodating the control of a late author’s estate and the ability to obtain the actual book through both purchase and lending institutions.

Of course the plan is not perfect…but is it a big step in the right direction? I tend to think it is.

You can read the article at: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22496

March 15, 2009

Inanimate Alice - Chapter 4

Filed under: Book News, Technology, Thriller — Tags: — david @ 7:17 pm

I blogged recently about Inanimate Alice, an online story interactively presented in a web browser. It combines the story with images, video, music, and interactive games to tell the story of a young girl named Alice who is 8 in the first chapter and 14 by the fourth chapter, which my daughter and I just enjoyed today. There are scheduled to be a total of 10 chapters, of which 4 are currently available.

As the chapters progress, the technical improvements in the story presentation are clear. The first two chapters have minimal user interactivity; the third and fourth introduce full games built directly into the story. What impressed me the most about the fourth chapter was that the presentation of the story has improved dramatically. Don’t get me wrong–I’ve liked the presentation in chapter 1-3. Chapter 4 just really takes it up a couple of notches. An example is that the text of the story appears, moves, and disappears along with the scenario. For example, in one scene the text moves up the stairs in the user’s POV, then turns left at the top of the stairs and disappears behind the wall. Very cool.

One other interesting thing in this chapter was a pseudo-marketing-tie-in. I say pseudo because while the product was in the story, there was no marketing, per se, in the story. On the credits screen at the end of the chapter, there’s a link to a website with more information. Unfortunately, the product in question seems to be tied to an Education system that requires previously gathered identification. Too bad…I was actually interested in it.

Again, if you like interactivity stories, I recommend you check it out: www.InanimateAlice.com.

February 25, 2009

Final Philip K. Dick book…

Filed under: Science Fiction - Fantasy, Technology, Thriller — Tags: , , — david @ 5:31 pm

Philip K. Dick’s widow is self-publishing a reworked version of the book that Dick was working on when he died. Story

Entitled The Owl in Daylight, the book is about a computer AI designed to run and amusement park but that gets bored and decided to rebel instead. This sounds a lot like a couple of my favorite Lincoln Child books: Death Match and Utopia.

Tessa Dick has said that the version is “an attempt to express ‘the spirit’ of Dick’s proposed book.” Unfortunately, little was known about the book aside from a letter written to his editor and agent. That alone makes this not a true Philip K. Dick book in my mind…at least not like my favorites: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and A Scanner Darkly.

Perhaps the most concerning item, however…is that Tessa Dick admits that there has not been much interest in her writing lately. Even for the rework of The Owl in Daylight. That’s why she is self-publishing the book. Given that Hollywood continues to make movies out of Dick’s books and popular authors like Child continue to draw inspiration from them, I would think that publishers would jump at anything with Philip K. Dick on the cover.

All that being said…I’ll probably still buy the book. Even if it’s not a true Philip K. Dick book…maybe it’s at least channeling him.

February 20, 2009

Prey, by Michael Crichton

Filed under: Light Reading, Technology, Thriller — Tags: — david @ 8:02 pm

Prey Prey by Michael Crichton



My review


rating: 4 of 5 stars
Like most Michael Crichton books, the story was well developed and I enjoyed learning about the characters.



What bothers me about Crichton books, however, is the technophobia that sometimes accompanies them. I can’t fully explain why, but this one was particularly bad. I came away from the book thinking that Crichton would be happier living in a log cabin in central Wisconsin. Usually I can dismiss this by reminding myself that without the technology going horribly wrong, there wouldn’t be a story. In this case, however, I just couldn’t get past what seemed like preaching against the evils of technology.


View all my reviews.

February 19, 2009

Interesting book about fractured attention.

Filed under: Book News, Society, Technology — Tags: , — david @ 12:43 am

Here’s a Salon article about a new book: Elsewhere, U.S.A.: How We Got from the Company Man, Family Dinners, and the Affluent Society to the Home Office, BlackBerry Moms, and Economic Anxiety, by Dalton Conley. The book covers the now common place act of sharing your attention at all times. It seems that we never focus on one task at a time anymore…we are driven to be working 24/7, playing with the kids whenever we can, planning our next big adventure, etc. I can’t tell you the last time I sat in a meeting at my day job where someone didn’t check email on their phone at least once.

In the interview, Conley talks the drive that makes people work more hours as they make more money, even when this seems counter-intuitive. His explanation is certainly plausible, however. At least, to a point. I’d like to think that when I win the lottery (if only I played), then I’d slow down and take more time to just relax. Because if his theory is correct and my multitasking, nonstop self increased in line with my new net worth…I’d be in real trouble.

And I am certainly no exception to the constant multitasking. It is 12:34 in the morning and I’m just getting to sit down and write now that the baby is asleep. Most “normal” people would have said forget it and gone to bed…but is that really what “normal” is anymore? With the group of people I associate with, both personally and professionally, the hectic, nonstop life I force on myself is the rule not the exception.

As a side note, as I’ve written this post, I’ve also checked the score of the basketball game I didn’t have time to watch, checked my email (twice), and ticked off some more entries in Google Reader. If I’m this busy at 12:30 in the morning…imagine what my waking hours are like. This book, at least, reminds me that I’m not alone…

Links:
Salon article: http://www.salon.com/books/int/2009/01/30/dalton_conley/index.html
Excerpt on NPR: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=100445061&ft=1&f=1032