September 7, 2009

Daemon, by Daniel Suarez

Great book!

It’s not often that I’ll start out a blog review like that…but this book really surprised me. The story was extremely well thought out, the characters likeable (or not, as appropriate), and the action kept the story moving along.

Now, I have to preface this by saying that this is a Geek novel. There are very specific references to computer hardware and protocols that would probably turn off non-Geeks. Fortunately, I am a Geek (Badge #L33T ;-), and I appreciated this book all the more for the accuracy of the technical details. Suarez is himself a computer security-type Geek, and that comes through in the detail of the book. It was like he was talking both of my primary languages (English and Geek).

Would this book appeal to non-computer types? Maybe. My wife is interested in reading it based on the parts of the book I’ve described. She’ll probably just gloss over the technical stuff that she wouldnt’ find interesting, which is probably fine. It’s not critical to following the story. In fact, you could probably remove it and the story would be fine. I could easily see a movie being made from this novel and the writers/director leaving out the technical details to increase mass market appeal.

So what is so appealing? It’s a typical What If? scenario. What if a computer genius invented a program (the “Daemon”) that could evolve and adapt to new scenarios to meet whatever goal was programmed into it? What if that program was spread across the Internet and couldn’t be eradicated by virus cleaners? And what if the creator of the program was a mad genius bent on changing social norms based on advanced technology?

That’s what this book is. It’s an excursion into a computer doomsday scenario–the typical AI takes over the world–but with so much thought put into it that you find yourself wondering if the Daemon is such a bad thing. Of course, killing people, which the Daemon has no problem doing, is bad…but is targeting evil corporations that make millions by swindling others, is that a bad thing?

That’s the cool part here. Imagine an evil corporation that is run by several generations of a single family and has a small board governing it. Who’s to stop that company from preying on the poor, the weak, the gullible? If it’s a private company, there’s no way to buy youself in. The best way in the door is through the computer. Take over the company’s computers, hold all of its information–and therefore, money–hostage…and you can do what you want with them.

And now, what if the creator was dead so that there’s no legal repurcussions possible and noone to tell you how to turn it off.

On top of that, throw in some other really cool, geeky stuff:

  • A virtual reality that controls the meatspace
  • Self-driving and autonomous cars
  • Secrets to accessing the daemon’s virtual world hidden in maps in First Person Shooter games.

All that raving being said, there are a couple of bad points…but are they really bad? One, there’s a twist at the end that was a bit annoying. Two, that twist–and a couple of other important points–sets up the forthcoming sequel. I’m thrilled that there’s a sequel planned, but it feels like this book is too dependant upon it. I wanted a more definitive conclusion to this book.

Some have compared this book to some of Michael Crichton’s work…I guess that’s fair. But the two things I like better about this book than I do most of Crichton’s work are that 1) the technology is more accurate/believable (which I’m sure some will dispute) and 2) I don’t get the technophobe/”the world is going to end if I use a toaster” feeling that I always get from Crichton (particulary Prey). Of course, I’ll keep reading Crichton since they fall into my favorite genre…but given two books on my nightstand, I’d pick up the Suarez one first!

Daniel Suarez is definitely on my NewBookAlerts list!

February 25, 2009

Final Philip K. Dick book…

Filed under: Science Fiction - Fantasy, Technology, Thriller — Tags: , , — david @ 5:31 pm

Philip K. Dick’s widow is self-publishing a reworked version of the book that Dick was working on when he died. Story

Entitled The Owl in Daylight, the book is about a computer AI designed to run and amusement park but that gets bored and decided to rebel instead. This sounds a lot like a couple of my favorite Lincoln Child books: Death Match and Utopia.

Tessa Dick has said that the version is “an attempt to express ‘the spirit’ of Dick’s proposed book.” Unfortunately, little was known about the book aside from a letter written to his editor and agent. That alone makes this not a true Philip K. Dick book in my mind…at least not like my favorites: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and A Scanner Darkly.

Perhaps the most concerning item, however…is that Tessa Dick admits that there has not been much interest in her writing lately. Even for the rework of The Owl in Daylight. That’s why she is self-publishing the book. Given that Hollywood continues to make movies out of Dick’s books and popular authors like Child continue to draw inspiration from them, I would think that publishers would jump at anything with Philip K. Dick on the cover.

All that being said…I’ll probably still buy the book. Even if it’s not a true Philip K. Dick book…maybe it’s at least channeling him.

February 19, 2009

Pop Goes the Weasel By James Patterson

Filed under: Detective Novel — Tags: , , , , , , — susan @ 10:37 pm

Book: Pop Goes the Weasel
Author: James Patterson
Blog By: Susan Burgett, Avid Suspense Reader

I found this a very solid suspense novel with a good plot. Multiple murders going undetected in a poor area except for one decent detective (Detective Alex Cross from previous line of books) who fights for justice. An interesting premise, and the suspense and action was great. I loved that I didn’t know what was going to happen next.

The only issue was, in several parts of the story, the writing came across as hokey. The writing style was not like other Patterson books that I have read. It kept throwing me so much as I read, I was shaking my head. I found out later that Patterson doesn’t write all his own books. The person who wrote this had a VERY feminine voice, which some might enjoy but I found it awkward in a suspense novel. From the voice of the tough burly black detective, who wants to hear the gooey love-sick thoughts? I found it distracting and somewhat annoying.

Just as much of the book is told from the vantage of the killer as the detective, so this book is not for someone looking for some light and funny reading. But it was great as the reader, to see the whole story unfold and yet enough was held back that I could not puzzle out what was going to happen next.

*Spoilers*

 I enjoyed this book but thought it was a little frustrating. It’s great to have suspenseful plot and an intelligent nemesis, but come on! Great depth of characters with awesome dialog was marred by extremism.

For instance, the main character Cross is a bleached-out hero who spends his free time with needy kids and working at a food kitchen when not with his two perfect children. And his nemesis is a really, really creepy bad guy, who, of course hates life, hates everything, and even wants to kill his own little children.

It was worth the read, but only if you don’t have anything else at hand. Not one of the better Patterson books.